The
cosmic neutrino background (CνB) is the universe's background particle radiation composed of
neutrinos.
Like the
cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB), the CνB is a relic of the
big bang, and while the CMB dates from when the universe was 380,000 years old, the CνB decoupled from matter when the universe was 2 seconds old. It is estimated that today the CνB has a temperature of roughly 1.95 K. Since low-energy neutrinos interact only very weakly with matter, they are notoriously difficult to detect and the CνB might never be observed directly. There is, however, compelling
indirect evidence for its existence.
Derivation of the temperature of the CνB
Given the temperature of the CMB, the temperature of the CνB can be estimated. Before
neutrinos decoupled from the rest of matter, the universe primarily consisted of neutrinos,
electrons,
positrons and
photons, all in
thermal equilibrium with each other. Once the temperature reached approximately 1 MeV, the neutrinos decoupled from the rest of matter. Despite this decoupling, neutrinos and photons remained at the same temperature as the universe expanded. However, when the temperature dropped below the mass of the electron, most
electrons and positrons annihilated, transferring their heat and entropy to photons, and thus increasing the temperature of the photons. So the ratio of the temperature of the photons before and after the electron-positron annihilation is the same as the ratio of the temperature of the photons and the neutrinos today. To find this ratio, we assume that the entropy of the universe was approximately conserved by the electron-positron annihilation. Then using
,
where
is the entropy,
is the effective number of
degrees of freedom and
is the temperature, we find that
,
where the subscript 0 denotes before the electron-positron annihilation and 1 denotes after. To find
, we add the degrees of freedom for electrons, positrons and photons:
- 2 for photons, since they are massless bosons
- 2(7/8) each for electrons and positrons, since they are fermions
is just 2 for photons. So
.
Given the current value of
, it follows that
.
The above discussion is valid for massless neutrinos, which are always relativistic. For neutrinos with a non-zero rest mass, the description in terms of a temperature is no longer appropriate after they become non-relativistic, i.e., when their thermal energy
falls below the rest mass energy
. Instead, in this case one should rather track their energy density, which remains well-defined.
Indirect evidence for the CνB
Relativistic neutrinos contribute to the radiation energy density of the Universe
R, typically parameterized in terms of the effective number of neutrino species
ν:
where
denotes the
redshift. The first term in the square brackets is due to the CMB, the second comes from the CνB. The
Standard Model with its three neutrino species predicts a value of
, including a small correction caused by a non-thermal distortion of the spectra during
e+-
e--
annihilation. The radiation density had a major impact on various physical processes in the early Universe, leaving potentially detectable imprints on measurable quantities, thus allowing us to
infer the value of
from observations.
Big Bang Nucleosynthesis
Due to its effect on the
expansion rate of the Universe during
Big Bang nucleosynthesis (BBN), the theoretical expectations for the primordial abundances of light elements depend on
. Astrophysical measurements of the primordial
4He and
Deuterium abundances lead to a value of
at 68%
c.l., in very good agreement with the Standard Model expectation.
CMB anisotropies and structure formation
The presence of the CνB affects the evolution of CMB anisotropies as well as the growth of matter perturbations in two ways: due to its contribution to the radiation density of the Universe (which determines for instance the time of matter-radiation equality), and due to the neutrinos' anisotropic stress which dampens the acoustic oscillations of the spectra. Additionally,
free-streaming massive neutrinos suppress the growth of structure on small scales. The
WMAP satellite's five-year data combined with type Ia
Supernova data and information about the baryon acoustic oscillation scale yield
at 68% c.l., providing an independent confirmation of the BBN constraints. In the near future, probes such as the
Planck satellite will likely improve present errors on
by an order of magnitude.
See also