right|thumb|320px|The expanding remnant of [[SN 1987A, a Type II-P supernova in the
Large Magellanic Cloud.
NASA image.]]
A
type II supernova belongs to a sub-category of cataclysmic
variable star known as a core-collapse supernova, which results from the internal collapse and violent explosion of a massive
star. The presence of hydrogen in its spectrum is what distinguishes a type II supernova from other classes of supernova explosions. A star must have at least 9 times the
mass of the Sun in order to undergo this type of core-collapse.
CORE COLLAPSE SUPERNOVA: -->Massive stars generate energy by the
nuclear fusion of elements. Unlike the Sun, these stars possess the mass needed to fuse elements that have an
atomic mass greater than hydrogen and helium. The star evolves to accommodate the fusion of these accumulating, higher mass elements, until finally a core of iron is produced. However, the nuclear fusion of iron produces no net energy to sustain the star, so the core becomes an inert mass that is supported only by the
degeneracy pressure of electrons. This pressure is created when any further compression of the star would require electrons to occupy the same
energy state, a condition that is not possible for this
type of particle. (See the
Pauli exclusion principle.)
When the mass of the iron core exceeds 1.44
solar masses (the
Chandrasekhar limit), an implosion ensues. The rapidly shrinking core heats up, causing rapid nuclear reactions that result in the formation of
neutrons and
neutrinos. The collapse is halted by short-ranged forces between these neutrons, causing the implosion to bounce outward. The energy of this expanding shock wave is sufficient to detach the surrounding stellar material, forming a supernova explosion.
There exist several categories of Type II supernova explosions, which are categorized based on the resulting
light curve—a graph of luminosity versus time—following the explosion. Type II-L supernovae show a steady (
Linear) decline of the light curve following the explosion, whereas Type II-P display a period of slower decline (a
Plateau) in their light curve followed by a normal decay.
Type Ib and Ic supernovae are a type of core-collapse supernova for a massive star that has shed its outer envelope of hydrogen and (for Type Ic) helium. As a result they appear to be lacking in these elements.
Formation
right|280px|thumb|The onion-like layers of a massive, evolved star just prior to core collapse. (Not to scale.)Stars far more massive than the sun evolve in more complex ways. In the core of the sun, hydrogen is
fused into helium, releasing
thermal energy which heats the sun's core and provides
pressure which supports the sun's layers against collapse (see
hydrostatic equilibrium). The helium produced in the core accumulates there since temperatures in the core are not yet high enough to cause it to fuse. Eventually, as the hydrogen at the core is exhausted, fusion starts to slow down and
gravity causes the core to contract. This contraction raises the temperature high enough to initiate a shorter phase of helium fusion, which accounts for less than 10% of the star's total lifetime. In stars with less than eight solar masses, the
carbon produced by helium fusion does not fuse, and the star gradually cools to become a
white dwarf.
White dwarf stars, if they have a near companion, may then become
Type Ia supernovae.
A much larger star, however, is massive enough to create temperatures and pressures needed to cause the carbon in the core to begin to fuse once the star contracts at the end of the helium-burning stage. The cores of these massive stars become layered like onions as progressively heavier atomic nuclei build up at the center, with an outermost layer of hydrogen gas, surrounding a layer of hydrogen fusing into helium, surrounding a layer of helium fusing into carbon (via the
triple-alpha process), surrounding layers that fuse to progressively heavier elements. As a star this massive evolves, it undergoes repeated stages where fusion in the core stops, and the core collapses until the pressure and temperature is sufficient to begin the next stage of fusion, reigniting to halt collapse.
Core collapse
The factor limiting this process is the amount of energy that is released through fusion, which is dependent on the
binding energy that holds together these atomic nuclei. Each additional step produces progressively heavier nuclei, which release progressively less energy when fusing. This continues until
nickel-56 is produced (which decays radioactively into
iron-56). As iron and nickel have the highest
binding energy per nucleon of all the elements, energy cannot be produced at the core by fusion, and a nickel-iron core grows.
This core is under huge gravitational pressure. As there is no fusion to further raise the star's temperature to support it against collapse, it is supported only by
degeneracy pressure of
electrons. In this state, matter is so dense that further compaction would require electrons to occupy the same
energy states. However, this is forbidden for identical
fermion particles (such as the electron)—a phenomenon called the
Pauli exclusion principle.
When the core's mass exceeds the
Chandrasekhar limit, degeneracy pressure can no longer support it, and catastrophic collapse ensues.
The outer part of the core reaches velocities of up to 70,000 km/s (23% of the
speed of light) as it collapses toward the center of the star.
The rapidly shrinking core heats up, producing high-energy
gamma rays that decompose iron
nuclei into helium nuclei and free
neutrons (via
photodisintegration). As the core's
density increases, it becomes energetically favorable for
electrons and
protons to merge (via inverse
beta decay), producing neutrons and
elementary particles called
neutrinos. Because neutrinos rarely interact with normal matter they can escape from the core, carrying away energy and further accelerating the collapse, which proceeds over a timescale of milliseconds. As the core detaches from the outer layers of the star, some of these neutrinos are absorbed by the star's outer layers, beginning the supernova explosion.
For Type II supernovae, the collapse is eventually halted by short-range repulsive neutron-neutron interactions (mediated by the
strong force), as well as by
degeneracy pressure of neutrons, at a density comparable to that of an atomic nucleus. Once collapse stops, the infalling matter rebounds, producing a
shock wave that propagates outward. The energy from this shock dissociates heavy elements within the core. This reduces the energy of the shock, which can stall the explosion within the outer core.
The core collapse phase is so dense and energetic that only neutrinos are able to escape. As the protons and electrons combine to form neutrons by means of
electron capture, an electron neutrino is produced. In a typical Type II supernova, the newly formed neutron core has an initial temperature of about 100 billion
kelvins; 10
5 times the temperature of the sun's core. Much of this thermal energy must be shed for a stable neutron star to form (otherwise the neutrons would "boil away"), and this is accomplished by a further release of neutrinos.
These 'thermal' neutrinos form as neutrino-antineutrino pairs of all
flavors, and total several times the number of electron-capture neutrinos. The two neutrino production mechanisms convert the gravitational
potential energy of the collapse into a ten second neutrino burst, releasing about 10
46 joules (100
foes).
Through a process that is not clearly understood, about 10
44 joules (1 foe) is reabsorbed by the stalled shock, producing an explosion.
The neutrinos generated by a supernova were actually observed in the case of
Supernova 1987A, leading astronomers to conclude that the core collapse picture is basically correct. The water-based
Kamiokande II and
IMB instruments detected antineutrinos of thermal origin,
[ while the gallium-71-based Baksan instrument detected neutrinos (lepton number = 1) of either thermal or electron-capture origin.]
480px|thumb|center| Within a massive, evolved star (a) the onion-layered shells of elements undergo fusion, forming an iron core (b) that reaches Chandrasekhar-mass and starts to collapse. The inner part of the core is compressed into neutrons (c), causing infalling material to bounce (d) and form an outward-propagating shock front (red). The shock starts to stall (e), but it is re-invigorated by neutrino interaction. The surrounding material is blasted away (f), leaving only a degenerate remnant.
When the progenitor star is below about 20 solar masses (depending on the strength of the explosion and the amount of material that falls back), the degenerate remnant of a core collapse is a neutron star. Above this mass the remnant collapses to form a black hole. The theoretical limiting mass for this type of core collapse scenario is about 40–50 solar masses. Above that mass, a star is believed to collapse directly into a black hole without forming a supernova explosion, although uncertainties in models of supernova collapse make calculation of these limits uncertain.Theoretical models
The Standard Model of particle physics is a theory which describes three of the four known fundamental interactions between the elementary particles that make up all matter. This theory allows predictions to be made about how particles will interact under many conditions. The energy per particle in a supernova is typically one to one hundred and fifty picojoules (tens to hundreds of MeV).
The per-particle energy involved in a supernova is small enough that the predictions gained from the Standard Model of particle physics are likely to be basically correct. But the high densities may require corrections to the Standard Model. In particular, Earth-based particle accelerators can produce particle interactions which are of much higher energy than are found in supernovae, but these experiments involve individual particles interacting with individual particles, and it is likely that the high densities within the supernova will produce novel effects. The interactions between neutrinos and the other particles in the supernova take place with the weak nuclear force, which is believed to be well understood. However, the interactions between the protons and neutrons involve the strong nuclear force, which is much less well understood.
The major unsolved problem with Type II supernovae is that it is not understood how the burst of neutrinos transfers its energy to the rest of the star producing the shock wave which causes the star to explode. From the above discussion, only one percent of the energy needs to be transferred to produce an explosion, but explaining how that one percent of transfer occurs has proven very difficult, even though the particle interactions involved are believed to be well understood. In the 1990s, one model for doing this involved convective overturn, which suggests that convection, either from neutrinos from below, or infalling matter from above, completes the process of destroying the progenitor star. Heavier elements than iron are formed during this explosion by neutron capture, and from the pressure of the neutrinos pressing into the boundary of the "neutrinosphere", seeding the surrounding space with a cloud of gas and dust which is richer in heavy elements than the material from which the star originally formed.
Neutrino physics, which is modeled by the Standard Model, is crucial to the understanding of this process. The other crucial area of investigation is the hydrodynamics of the plasma that makes up the dying star; how it behaves during the core collapse determines when and how the "shock wave" forms and when and how it "stalls" and is reenergized. Computer models have been very successful at calculating the behavior of Type II supernovae once the shock has been formed. By ignoring the first second of the explosion, and assuming that an explosion is started, astrophysicists have been able to make detailed predictions about the elements produced by the supernova and of the expected light curve from the supernova.Light curves and unusual spectra
right|thumb|280px|This graph of the luminosity (relative to the Sun) as a function of time shows the characteristic shapes of the light curves for a Type II-L and II-P supernova.
When the spectrum of a Type II supernovae is examined, it normally displays Balmer absorption lines—the characteristic frequencies where hydrogen atoms absorbs energy. The presence of these lines are used to distinguish this category of supernova from a Type Ia supernova.
When the luminosity of a Type II supernova is plotted over a period of time, it shows a characteristic rise to a peak brightness followed by a decline. These light curves have an average decay rate of 0.008 magnitudes per day; much lower than the decay rate for Type Ia supernovae. Type II are sub-divided into two classes, depending on the shape of the light curve. The light curve for a Type II-L supernova shows a steady (linear) decline following the peak brightness. By contrast, the light curve of a Type II-P supernova has a distinctive flat stretch (called a plateau) during the decline; representing a period where the luminosity decays at a slower rate. The net luminosity decay rate is lower, at 0.0075 magnitudes per day for Type II-P, compared to 0.012 magnitudes per day for Type II-L.
The difference in the shape of the light curves is believed to be caused, in the case of Type II-L supernovae, by the expulsion of most of the hydrogen envelope of the progenitor star. The plateau phase in Type II-P supernovae is due to a change in the opacity of the exterior layer. The shock wave ionizes the hydrogen in the outer envelope—stripping the electron from the hydrogen atom—resulting in a significant increase in the opacity. This prevents photons from the inner parts of the explosion from escaping. Once the hydrogen cools sufficiently to recombine, the outer layer becomes transparent.
Of the Type II supernovae with unusual features in their spectra, Type IIn supernovae may be produced by the interaction of the ejecta with circumstellar material. Type IIb supernovae are likely massive stars which have lost most, but not all, of their hydrogen envelopes through tidal stripping by a companion star. As the ejecta of a Type IIb expands, the hydrogen layer quickly becomes more transparent and reveals the deeper layers.Hypernovae (collapsars)
The core collapse of sufficiently massive stars may not be halted. Degeneracy pressure and repulsive neutron-neutron interactions can only support a neutron star whose mass does not exceed the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff limit of very roughly 4 solar masses. Above this limit, the core collapses to directly form a black hole, perhaps producing a (still theoretical) hypernova explosion. In the proposed hypernova mechanism (known as a collapsar) two extremely energetic jets of plasma are emitted from the star's rotational poles at nearly light speed. These jets emit intense gamma rays, and are one of many candidate explanations for gamma ray bursts.See also