Robert Brown FRS (21 December 1773 – 10 June 1858) was a Scottish botanist who made important contributions to botany largely through his pioneering use of the microscope. His contributions include the discovery of the
cell nucleus and
cytoplasmic streaming; the first observation of
Brownian motion; early work on plant
pollination and
fertilisation, including being the first to recognise the fundamental difference between
gymnosperms and
angiosperms; and some of the earliest studies in
palynology. He also made numerous contributions to plant taxonomy, including the erection of a number of plant families that are still accepted today; and numerous
Australian plant genera and species, the fruit of his exploration of that continent with
Matthew Flinders.
Early life
Brown was born in
Montrose,
Scotland on 21 December 1773. He was the son of
James Brown, a minister in the
Scottish Episcopal Church with
Jacobite convictions so strong that in 1788 he defied his church's decision to give allegiance to
George III. His mother was Helen
née Taylor, the daughter of a
Presbyterian minister. As a child Brown attended the local Grammar School (now
Montrose Academy), then
Marischal College at
Aberdeen, but withdrew in his fourth year when the family moved to
Edinburgh in 1790. His father died late the following year.
Brown enrolled to study
medicine at the
University of Edinburgh, but developed an interest in
botany, and ended up spending more of his time on the latter than the former. He attended the lectures of
John Walker; made botanical expeditions into the
Scottish Highlands, alone or with nurserymen such as
George Don; and wrote out meticulous botanical descriptions of the plants he collected. He also began corresponding with and collecting for
William Withering, one of the foremost British botanists of his day. Highlights for Brown during this period include his discovery of a new species of grass,
Alopecurus alpinus; and his first botanical paper, "
The botanical history of Angus", read to the Edinburgh Natural History Society in January 1792, but not published in print in Brown's lifetime.
[Mabberley (1985) pp. 18–28.]thumb|left|Brown as a young manBrown dropped out of his medical course in 1793. Late in 1794, he enlisted in the
Fifeshire Fencibles, and his regiment was posted to
Ireland shortly after. In June 1795 he was appointed
Surgeon's Mate. His regiment saw very little action, however, he had a good deal of leisure time, almost all of which he spent on botany. However he was frustrated by his itinerant lifestyle, which prevented him from building his personal library and specimen collection as he would have liked, and cut him off from the most important herbaria and libraries.
[Mabberley (1985) p. 28–60.]During this period Brown was especially interested in
cryptogams, and these would be the subject of Brown's first, albeit unattributed, publication. Brown began a correspondence with
William Dickson, and by 1796 was sending him specimens and descriptions of mosses. Dickson incorporated Brown's descriptions into his
Fasciculi plantarum cryptogamicarum britanniae, with Brown's permission but without any attribution.
By 1800, Brown was firmly established amongst Irish botanists, and was corresponding with a number of British and foreign botanists, including Withering, Dickson,
James Edward Smith and
José Correia da Serra. He had been nominated to the
Linnean Society of London; had contributed to Dickson's
Fasciculi; was acknowledged in a number of other works; and had had a species of
algae,
Conferva brownii (now
Aegagropila linnaei) named after him by
Lewis Weston Dillwyn. He had also begun experimenting with
microscopy. However as an army surgeon stationed in Ireland there seemed little prospect of him attracting the notice of those who could offer him a career in botany.
To Australia on the Investigator
In 1798, Brown heard that
Mungo Park had withdrawn from a proposed expedition into the interior of
New Holland (now
Australia), leaving a vacancy for a
naturalist. At Brown's request, Correia wrote to
Sir Joseph Banks, suggesting Brown as a suitable replacement: He was not selected, and the expedition did not end up going ahead as originally proposed, though
George Caley was sent to
New South Wales as a botanical collector for Banks. In 1800, however,
Matthew Flinders put to Banks a proposal for an expedition that would answer the question whether New Holland was one island or several. Banks approved Flinders' proposal, and in December 1800 wrote to Brown offering him the position of naturalist to the expedition. Brown accepted immediately.
[Mabberley (1985), pp. 59–63.]Preparations
Brown was told to expect to sail at the end of 1800, only a few weeks after being offered the position. However a succession of delays meant the voyage did not get under way until July 1801. Brown spent much of the meantime preparing for the voyage by studying Banks' Australian plant specimens and copying out notes and descriptions for use on the voyage.
[Mabberley (1985), pp. 66–72.]Though Brown's brief was collect scientific specimens of all sorts, he was told to give priority to plants, insects and birds, and to treat other fields, such as
geology, as secondary pursuits. In addition to Brown, the scientific staff comprised the renowned
botanical illustrator Ferdinand Bauer; the gardener
Peter Good, whose task was to collect live plants and viable seed for the use of
Kew Gardens; the
miner John Allen, appointed as
mineralogist; the
landscape artist William Westall; and the
astronomer John Crosley, who would fall ill on the voyage out and leave the ship at the
Cape of Good Hope. Brown was given authority over Bauer and Good, both of whom were instructed to give any specimens that might collect to Brown, rather than forming separate collections. Both men would provide enthusiastic and hard-working companions for Brown, and thus Brown's specimen collections contain material collected by all three men.
Desertas, Madeira and the Cape of Good Hope
The
Investigator sailed from London on 18 July. They made brief landfalls at
Bugio Island (
Desertas Islands) and
Madeira, but Brown was disappointed to collect almost nothing of note from either site. They arrived at the
Cape of Good Hope on 16 October, staying a little over two weeks, during which time Brown made extensive botanical expeditions, and climbed
Table Mountain at least twice. Many years later he would write to
William Henry Harvey, who was considering emigrating there, that "some of the pleasantest botanizing he ever had was on
Devil's Mountain, near
Cape Town, and he thought I could not pitch on a more delightful field of study."
Amongst the plants collected at the Cape were two new species of
Serruria (
Proteaceae),
S. foeniculacea and
S. flagellaris.
[Mabberley (1985), pp. 73–79.]Australia
The
Investigator arrived in
King George Sound in what is now
Western Australia in December 1801. For three and a half years Brown did intensive botanic research in Australia, collecting about 3400 species, of which about 2000 were previously unknown. A large part of this collection was lost, however, when the
Porpoise was wrecked
en route to England.
Brown remained in Australia until May 1805. He then returned to Britain where he spent the next five years working on the material he had gathered. He published numerous species descriptions; in Western Australia alone he is the author of nearly 1200 species.
Subsequent career
In early 1809 he read his paper called
On the natural order of plants called Proteaceae to the
Linnean Society of London. This was subsequently published in March 1810 as
On the Proteaceae of Jussieu. It is significant for its contribution to the
systematics of Proteaceae, and to the
floristics of
Australia, and also for its application of
palynology to systematics. This work was extensively plagiarised by
Richard Anthony Salisbury, who had memorised much of the Linnean reading and then inserted it in
Joseph Knight's 1809 publication
On the cultivation of the plants belonging to the natural order of Proteeae.
In 1810, he published the results of his collecting in his famous
Prodromus Florae Novae Hollandiae et Insulae Van Diemen, the first systematic account of the Australian flora. That year, he succeeded
Jonas C. Dryander as Sir
Joseph Banks' librarian, and on Banks' death in 1820 Brown inherited his
library and
herbarium. This was transferred to the
British Museum in 1827, and Brown was appointed Keeper of the Banksian Botanical Collection.
In 1822, he was elected a foreign member of the
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.
In a paper read to the Linnean society in 1831 and published in 1833, Brown named the
cell nucleus. The nucleus had been observed before, perhaps as early as 1682 by the Dutch microscopist
Leeuwenhoek, and
Franz Bauer had noted and drawn it as a regular feature of plant cells in 1802, but it was Brown who gave it the name it bears to this day (while giving credit to Bauer's drawings). Neither Bauer nor Brown thought the nucleus to be universal, and Brown thought it to be primarily confined to
Monocotyledons.
After the division of the Natural History Department of the British Museum into three sections in 1837, Robert Brown became the first Keeper of the Botanical Department, remaining so until his death at
Soho Square in
London on
June 10 1858. He was succeeded by
John Joseph Bennett.
Brown is buried in
Kensal Green Cemetery in London.
Brown's name is commemorated in the Australia
herb genus Brunonia as well as numerous Australian species such as
Eucalyptus brownii,
Banksia brownii and the moss
Brown's Tetrodontium Moss (
Tetrodontium brownianum), a species which he discovered growing at
Roslin near
Edinburgh whilst still a student. The plant can still be found at the site of its discovery.
[ Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh. Retrieved 15 May 2008.] Passing through the suburb of Kingston, south of Hobart, Tasmania, formerly Van Diemen's Land, is
Brown's River, named in his honor, upon the banks of which, he collected botanical samples.
Mount Brown in
British Columbia, Canada is named for him as well.
Brownian motion
In 1827, while examining
pollen grains and the spores of
mosses and
Equisetum suspended in water under a
microscope, Brown observed minute particles within vacuoles in the pollen grains executing a continuous jittery motion. He then observed the same motion in particles of dust, enabling him to rule out the hypothesis that the effect was due to pollen being alive. Although Brown did not provide a theory to explain the motion, and
Jan Ingenhousz already had reported a similar effect using charcoal particles, in German and French publications of 1784 and 1785, the phenomenon is now known as
Brownian motion.
In recent years it was generally held that Brown's microscopes were insufficient to reveal phenomena of this order. Brown's re-discoveries were denied in a brief paper in 1991. Shortly thereafter, in a hastily-compiled illustrated presentation, British microscopist
Brian J. Ford presented to Inter Micro 1991 in Chicago a reprise of the demonstration. His video sequences substantiated Brown's observations.
Publications
For a list of Brown's publications, see
Wikisource:Author:Robert Brown.
See also
Notes and references
.jpg/){kind=link}