Dongyi () was a collective term for people in eastern China and in the east of China. People referred to as Dongyi vary across the ages.
The word yi 夷
The
Chinese word
yi in
Dongyi has a long history and complex semantics.
Meanings
Chinese dictionaries give various meanings of
yi 夷. English translations include:
- (in ancient China) barbarians in the east
- foreign tribes or foreigners
- to level; to make level, even or smooth
- to eliminate; to exterminate; to kill; to execute
These first two senses of
yi reflect the linguistic
Sinocentrism of Chinese words that can mean both condescending "
barbarian" and semantically neutral "foreigner; outsider". For instance,
hu 胡 "barbarian; foreign; non-Chinese" (e.g.,
erhu) originally meant
hu 鬍 "beard; whiskers", and was chosen to name the Hu 胡 or
Donghu 東胡 "eastern barbarians: an ancient
Tungusic people northeast of China".
Characters

The Chinese character yi 夷 consists of 大 "big" and 弓 "bow".
thumb|150pix|Oracle bone script for
yi 夷 or
shi 尸
The modern
Chinese character 夷 for
yi "barbarian; foreigner; etc." combines
da 大 "big" and
gong 弓 "bow". However, it graphically descends from an ancient
pictograph showing a person with a bent back and legs.
The (121 CE)
Shuowen Jiezi character dictionary, which defines
yi 夷 as 平 "level; peaceful" or 東方之人 "people of eastern regions", first records that this
Han Dynasty (206 BCE-220 CE)
regular script 夷 and the
Qin Dynasty (221-207 BCE)
seal script for
shi incorporate the 大 "big" and 弓 "bow"
radicals (recurring character elements). The Dongyi are associated with
archery, and legends say their leader
Houyi 后羿 invented the bow.
Bernhard Karlgren says that in the earlier
bronze script for
yi inscribed on
Zhou Dynasty (ca. 1045 BCE-ca. 256 BCE)
Chinese bronze inscriptions, "The graph has 'man' and 'arrow', or 'arrow' with something wound around the shaft."
The earliest records of
yi were inscribed on
oracle bones dating from the late
Shang Dynasty (ca. 1600–ca. 1046 BCE). This
oracle bone script was used interchangeably for
yi 夷 and for
shi 尸 "corpse;
personator of the dead; inactive; lay out". The historical linguist Xu Zhongshu explains this oracle character depicts either a "corpse"' with two bent legs or a "barbarian" custom of sitting with one's legs stretched out instead of the Chinese norm of squatting on one's heels.
Etymology
Historical linguists have tentatively reconstructed
yi 夷's ancient pronunciations and
etymology. The modern
Standard Mandarin pronunciation
yi descends from (ca. 6th-9th centuries CE)
Middle Chinese and (ca. 6th-3rd centuries BCE)
Old Chinese. Middle and Old Chinese reconstructions of
yi 夷 "barbarian; spread out" include
i < *
djər,
yij < *
ljɨj, and
ji < *
ləi.
Axel Schuessler hypothesizes an Old Chinese etymological development from *
li 夷 "extend; expose; display; set out; spread out" to *
lhi 尸 "to spread out; lie down flat (in order to sleep); motionless; to set forth (sacrificial dishes)", to "personator of a dead ancestor", and to "corpse".
Historical usages
Pre-Qin usages
It is not easy to determine the times of people that a
Classical Chinese document reflects.
Literature describing a pre-
Xia Dynasty period does not use the
character yi. As for the Xia Dynasty, some groups of people are referred to as the Yi. For example, "Yu Gong" (禹貢) of the
Classic of History calls people in Qingzhou and Xuzhou as Laiyi (萊夷), Yuyi (嵎夷) and Huaiyi (淮夷). Another yi-related term is Jiu-yi (九夷), literally
Nine Yi, which could have also had the connotation
The Numerous Yi or
The Many Different Kinds of Yi, and which appears in the famous passage in The Analects that reads, "The Master (i.e.,
Confucius) desired to live among the Nine Yi." The term "Dongyi" is not used for this period.
Shang Dynasty oracle shell and bone writings record
yi but not
Dongyi. Shima Kunio's
concordance of oracle inscriptions lists twenty occurrences of the script for 夷 or 尸, most frequently (6 times) in the
compound zhishi 祉尸 "bless the personator; blessed personator". Michael Carr notes some contexts are ambiguous, but at least, "Three compounds refer to 'barbarians' (in modern characters,
fayi 伐夷 'attack barbarians,'
zhengyi 征夷 'punish barbarians,' and
yifang 夷方 'barbarian regions')." Oracle inscriptions record that Shang King
Wu Ding (r. ca. 1250-1192 BCE) made military expeditions on the Yi, and King
Di Xin (r. ca. 1075-1046 BCE) waged a massive campaign against the Yifang 夷方 "barbarian regions".
It appears that the Yifang were the same people as Huaiyi (
Huai River Yi), Nanhuaiyi (Southern Huai Yi), Nanyi (Southern Yi) and Dongyi in bronzeware inscriptions of the Western Zhou Dynasty. The
Zhou Dynasty attempted to keep the Yi under its control. The most notable is the successful campaign against the Huaiyi and the Dongyi by the
Duke of Zhou.
During the
Spring and Autumn Period,
Jin,
Zheng,
Qi and
Song tried to seize control of the Huai River basin, which was occupied by the Huaiyi. But the region finally fell under the influence of
Chu in the south. At the same time, people in the east and south ceased to be called Dongyi as they founded their own states. These Yifang states include the State of Xu and the State of Jiang. The State of Xu occupied large areas of Jiangxi, Jiangsu and Anhui between the Huai and Yangzi Rivers. Eventually, it was conquered by the State of Wu in 512 BC. The State of Jiang was absorbed by Chu. Recent archaeological excavations reveal that the State of Xu's influence extended to western Jiangxi in modern Jing'an County. This includes bronzeware inscriptions about the State of Xu and also a tomb with many
nanmu coffins containing sacrificial female victims.
References to Dongyi became ideological during the
Warring States period probably because selves and others had subtle cultural differences among Chinese. The
Classic of Rites (early 4th BC) made the first reference to the combination of "Dongyi" (east), "Xirong" (west), "Nanman" (south) and "Beidi" (north) in fixed four directions. At the same time "Dongyi" acquired a clearly pejorative nuance.
Post-Qin usages
thumb|"Barbarians" in the ancient [[Sinocentric world, including eastern Dongyi 東夷, western
Xirong 西戎, southern
Nanman 南蠻, and northern
Beidi 北狄, plus
Huawaizhidi 化外之地 "uncivilized regions".]]
The more "
China" expanded, the further east the term "Dongyi" was applied to. The
Records of the Grand Historian by
Sima Qian uses the term "Manyi" (蠻夷), but not "Dongyi". It puts the section of "Xinanyi (southwestern Yi) liezhuan (biographies)", but not "Dongyi liezhuan". The
Book of Han does not put this section either but calls a
Dongye (濊) chief in the Korean Peninsula as Dongyi. The
Book of Later Han puts the section of "Dongyi liezhuan (東夷列伝)" and covers
Buyeo,
Yilou,
Goguryeo, Dongwozu, Hui,
Samhan and
Wa, in other words, eastern
Manchuria,
Korea,
Japan and some other islands. The
Book of Jin positioned Dongyi inside the section of "Siyi" (barbarians in four directions) along with "Xirong", "Nanman" and "Beidi". The
Book of Sui, the
Book of Tang and the
New Book of Tang adopt the section of "Dongyi" and covers eastern Manchuria, Korea, Japan and optionally Sakhalin and Taiwan. During the Song Dynasty, the official history books replaced Dongyi with Waiguo (外國) and Waiyi (外夷).
Other usage of Dongyi in Chinese history books
1)
Records of the Grand Historian and
Book of HanThese two history books do not assign many chapters to describe the history of Dongyi. However, it includes the simple description
Wiman Joseon. Wiman fled from the
state of Yan to
Gojoseon, and he disguised as if he was
Gojoseon people. As describing the disguise of Wiman, Sima Qian says that that Gojoseon people are Manyi(蠻夷) instead of Dongyi.
Book of Han uses the same term as Records of the Grand Historian.
2)
Book of the Later HanThis book was written by
Fan Ye (historian). This book contains the chapter of 'Dongyi', which describes the history of
Korea including
Buyeo,
Goguryeo,
Okjeo,
Dongye, and
Samhan, and
Japan including
Wa.
3)
Records of Three KingdomsThis book was written by Chen Shou, and also contains the chapter about 'Dongyi'. The chapter of "Wuwan Xianbei Dongyi" describes the Wuwan tribes, Xianbei tribes, and Dongyi tribes respectively. In the section of Dongyi, this book explains the
Korean and
Japanese ancient kingdoms. Korean kingdoms include
Buyeo,
Goguryeo,
Okjeo,
Dongye, and
Samhan. Japanese kingdom includes
Wa (Japan).
4)
Book of JinThis book was written by Fang Xuanling at Tang dynasty. It has the chapter of 'Four Yi', and describes the
Manchurian, Korean, and Japanese history. Machurian and Korean include
Buyeo,
Mahan confederacy,
Jinhan confederacy and
Sushen. Japaneses includes
Wa (Japan)5)
Book of SongThis history book describes the history of
Liu Song Dynasty, but also contains the simple explanation the neighbor states. The Chapter of Dongyi of this book describes the ancient history of
Korea and
Japan such as
Goguryeo,
Baekje and
Wa (Japan).
6)
Book of QiThe Book of Qi is the history book of
Southern Qi. In the 58th volume, the history of Dongyi's history is described, which includes the ancient Korean and Japanese history such as
Goguryeo,
Baekje,
Gaya and
Wa (Japan).
7)
History of Southern DynastiesThis book is about the history of Liu Song, Southern Qi, Liang Dynasty, and Chen Dynasty, but also includes the history of Dongyi. In the chapter of Dongyi, this book describes the Korean and Japanese history such as
Goguryeo,
Baekje,
Silla,
Wa (Japan), and so on. . Interestingly, this book says that Dongyi's state was
Gojoseon while Sima Qian says that Gojoseon people is Manyi. .
8)
Book of SuiThe
Book of Sui describes the history about the
Sui Dynasty, and was compiled at
Tang dynasty. The chapter of Dongyi's history describes the history of Korean, Manchurian and Japanese such as
Goguryeo,
Baekje,
Silla,
Mohe,
Liuqiu, and
Wa (Japan).
Modern usages
China
Some Chinese scholars extend the historical use of Dongyi to
prehistoric times. They consider Dongyi as one of the origins of
Chinese people, based on the hypothesis of the pluralistic origins of
Chinese culture that became popular in 1980s.
People called Dongyi in this sense lived in Haidai (海岱) region, the lower reaches of the
Yellow and Huai Rivers, from the Neolithic period.
The cultural evolution in Haidai region is considered as follows:
The ages differ among scholars
The Shandong Longshan culture was characterized by large-scale hierarchical groups of walled settlements. The Yueshi culture which replaced the Longshan culture around 2000 B.C. saw a decline of civilization. Groups of settlements were dissolved and the highly-developed pottery technology of the Shandong Longshan culture was lost.
(Note: The Longshan Culture was not just Dongyi and did not just exist in Shandong and other eastern coastal areas of China. Areas further west, including much of the middle and lower Yellow River Valley region, was also a part of the Longshan Culture area. Historians such as Jacques Gernet think that the Longshan Culture was also culturally ancestral to the Erlitou Culture and the later Shang dynasty in the middle Yellow River Valley region. There are some good evidence for this claim, for both the Longshan and Shang cultures shared the following basic elements:
- A similar technical of divination based on heating animal bones and shells until they crack.
- Similar construction techniques for city-walls, fortifications and building platforms using rammed earth.
The Shang dynasty technology of bronze metallurgy seems to be the descendant of high temperature ceramic-making techniques used by the late Neolithic Longshan Culture.
The Longshan Culture might have been replaced by the Yueshi Culture in Shandong but further to the west it continued and developed into the Erlitou Culture around 1900 - 1800 BC.)
During the Yueshi culture in Shandong, the
Erlitou culture and the subsequent
Erligang culture gradually stretched from the Yellow River valley in the west. Since sites of the Yueshi culture are coterminous with those of the Erligang culture, the traditional theory that the Shang Dynasty originated in the east was shattered. Shang civilization extended to central Shandong at the end of the Shang Dynasty and it was during the middle Western Zhou Dynasty that the central civilization covered the entire Haidai region.

Eleven characters found at Dinggong in Shandong, China on a pottery sherd, Longshan culture
It is notable that Longshan people seemingly had their own writing system. A pottery inscription of the Longshan culture discovered in Dinggong Village, Zouping County, Shandong Province contains eleven characters and they do not look like the direct ancestor of
Chinese characters. Chinese scholar Feng Shi (馮時) argued in 1994 that this inscription can be interpreted as written by the Longshan people. Other scholars, like Ming Ru, are doubtful about attributing a Neolithic date to the inscription. Some other scholars also claim a connection between ancient Dongyi and the modern
Yi people in southwestern China.
See also
Footnotes